I have learned a lot from the current events assignments. I now know much more about what is happening in different regions of the world, and I know where to look for more information about current events. Focusing on one region for a while before switching focus to another helped me see how the events happening in one area can be similar or even directly related to events somewhere else. I could have learned more by spending more time trying to find sources of news and by doing research on the histories of the countries in each region I studied. Next time, I think that students would benefit from class and group discussions. Now that I know where to look for news and have some knowledge of what is happening in the world, I am interested in current events and I will try to stay updated on them.
Friday, June 6, 2008
Monday, May 12, 2008
5/12/08 Homework
29 c. The Brown Decision, Ten Years Later
1. Which states in the region shown on the map began to integrate their public
schools in the year of the Brown v. Board of Education decision? (Do not count
the District of Columbia.)
West Virginia, Texas, Maryland, and Delaware
2. In which states did school desegregation not begin until the 1960s?
Louisiana, Mississippi, Alabama, Georgia, and South Carolina
3. What generalization can you make about the relationship between the time a
state began the desegregation process and the degree of integration of its
schools in 1964?
The states that started desegregation earlier had a greater percentage of African Americans attending desegregated schools. Texas is an exception to this.
4. In which states were 30 to 60 percent of African-American students in
integrated schools?
Oklahoma, Missouri, Maryland and Delaware
5. In which states was the percentage of African-American students in integrated
schools less than the region’s average?
Arizona, Mississippi, Alabama, Georgia, South Carolina, Louisiana, Florida, North Carolina, Texas, Tennessee, and Virginia
6. Which five of the states you listed for question 5 had percentages the farthest
below the regional average?
Arizona, Mississippi, Alabama, Georgia, and South Carolina. These were slave states before the Civil War.
29 g. Triumph of a Crusade
Complete the chart below by explaining how each of the entries promoted the cause
of the civil rights and greater equality for African Americans.
Freedom rides: Tested Supreme Court decisions of desegregation
March on Birmingham: Protests desegregated a city known for racism
Civil Rights Act of 1964: Prohibited discrimination against things such as race, religion, and gender
24th Amendment: States could not change the conditions or requirements necessary for someone to have the right to vote
March on Selma: Showed an example of the violence caused by racism
Voting Rights Act of 1965: Eliminated literacy tests required for voting rights, allowing more people to vote
1. Which states in the region shown on the map began to integrate their public
schools in the year of the Brown v. Board of Education decision? (Do not count
the District of Columbia.)
West Virginia, Texas, Maryland, and Delaware
2. In which states did school desegregation not begin until the 1960s?
Louisiana, Mississippi, Alabama, Georgia, and South Carolina
3. What generalization can you make about the relationship between the time a
state began the desegregation process and the degree of integration of its
schools in 1964?
The states that started desegregation earlier had a greater percentage of African Americans attending desegregated schools. Texas is an exception to this.
4. In which states were 30 to 60 percent of African-American students in
integrated schools?
Oklahoma, Missouri, Maryland and Delaware
5. In which states was the percentage of African-American students in integrated
schools less than the region’s average?
Arizona, Mississippi, Alabama, Georgia, South Carolina, Louisiana, Florida, North Carolina, Texas, Tennessee, and Virginia
6. Which five of the states you listed for question 5 had percentages the farthest
below the regional average?
Arizona, Mississippi, Alabama, Georgia, and South Carolina. These were slave states before the Civil War.
29 g. Triumph of a Crusade
Complete the chart below by explaining how each of the entries promoted the cause
of the civil rights and greater equality for African Americans.
Freedom rides: Tested Supreme Court decisions of desegregation
March on Birmingham: Protests desegregated a city known for racism
Civil Rights Act of 1964: Prohibited discrimination against things such as race, religion, and gender
24th Amendment: States could not change the conditions or requirements necessary for someone to have the right to vote
March on Selma: Showed an example of the violence caused by racism
Voting Rights Act of 1965: Eliminated literacy tests required for voting rights, allowing more people to vote
Wednesday, May 7, 2008
Current Events Summary #8
Egypt:
Egypt has gotten involved in conflicts between other nations. Israel has been fighting against Palestine in the Gaza strip, and Egypt has decided to attempt to make peace. Egypt has begun discussions of peace with Israel. At the moment, Palestine seems to fully support these efforts, but Israel seems uncertain, saying that it will not agree to sign a cease-fire, nor would it be the first to undermine it.
Morocco/Algeria:
There have also been tensions between Morocco and Algeria. These two African countries have closed their borders and begun a fierce arms race. Algeria has recently rejected an offer by Morocco to reopen the borders, making matters worse. If this conflict is not resolved soon, it could slow the progress of uniting North Africa under the Arab Maghreb Union.
Egypt has gotten involved in conflicts between other nations. Israel has been fighting against Palestine in the Gaza strip, and Egypt has decided to attempt to make peace. Egypt has begun discussions of peace with Israel. At the moment, Palestine seems to fully support these efforts, but Israel seems uncertain, saying that it will not agree to sign a cease-fire, nor would it be the first to undermine it.
Morocco/Algeria:
There have also been tensions between Morocco and Algeria. These two African countries have closed their borders and begun a fierce arms race. Algeria has recently rejected an offer by Morocco to reopen the borders, making matters worse. If this conflict is not resolved soon, it could slow the progress of uniting North Africa under the Arab Maghreb Union.
Monday, May 5, 2008
Chapter 25 Homework
Guided Reading:
A. As you read about how the United States mobilized for war, note how each of the
following contributed to that effort.
1. Selective Service System:
Government enlisted more men as soldiers to fight in the war
2. Women:
Women's Army Auxiliary Corps (WAAC) served in non combat positions and supported troops
3. Minorities:
Many joined the army, but they often felt that they should not be fighting in the war
4. Manufacturers :
Government made factories convert to war productions
5. A. Philip Randolph:
Demanded "the right to work and fight for our country"
6. Office of Scientific Research
and Development (OSRD):
Created by government to experiment with new drugs and technology for the war
7. Entertainment industry:
Made films that glorified allies and incriminated the enemy
8. Office of Price Administration (OPA):
Raised taxes and fought inflation to help the economy.
9. War Production Board (WPB):
Decided which factories converted to war productions.
10. Rationing:
Saved resources often used at home for the use of the military.
Primary Source
c. War Ration Stamps
Discussion Questions:
1. Why do you think the war ration book requires
information on a person’s age, sex, weight,
height, and occupation?
The amount of rationing required may differ depending on these things.
2. What was the penalty for violating rationing reg-
ulations?
The penalty is a $10,000 fine, imprisonment, or both.
3. Most Americans during World War II accepted
rationing. Why do you think this was so?
The government's laws regarding rationing were strict, and people wanted to do what was best for their country.
A. As you read about how the United States mobilized for war, note how each of the
following contributed to that effort.
1. Selective Service System:
Government enlisted more men as soldiers to fight in the war
2. Women:
Women's Army Auxiliary Corps (WAAC) served in non combat positions and supported troops
3. Minorities:
Many joined the army, but they often felt that they should not be fighting in the war
4. Manufacturers :
Government made factories convert to war productions
5. A. Philip Randolph:
Demanded "the right to work and fight for our country"
6. Office of Scientific Research
and Development (OSRD):
Created by government to experiment with new drugs and technology for the war
7. Entertainment industry:
Made films that glorified allies and incriminated the enemy
8. Office of Price Administration (OPA):
Raised taxes and fought inflation to help the economy.
9. War Production Board (WPB):
Decided which factories converted to war productions.
10. Rationing:
Saved resources often used at home for the use of the military.
Primary Source
c. War Ration Stamps
Discussion Questions:
1. Why do you think the war ration book requires
information on a person’s age, sex, weight,
height, and occupation?
The amount of rationing required may differ depending on these things.
2. What was the penalty for violating rationing reg-
ulations?
The penalty is a $10,000 fine, imprisonment, or both.
3. Most Americans during World War II accepted
rationing. Why do you think this was so?
The government's laws regarding rationing were strict, and people wanted to do what was best for their country.
Thursday, March 27, 2008
Centralized State Power
Introduction- Over the course of the United States' history, the power of the federal government has varied with different presidencies, but has gradually increased over the long-term. One particular time in which the growth of federal power can be seen was the period that went from the beginning of World War II to near the end of the Cold War. In this time, the creations of certain laws and agencies that gave more responsibility to the government were often necessary or in the nation's best interests.
1. Domestic Events during World War II- In the events during and surrounding World War II, the government had to make certain laws and agencies in order to support the war and to keep the domestic sit
uation organized. One decision that was made was to recruit soldiers to fight in the war with a draft. In 1940, President Roosevelt signed the Selective Training and Service Act. Men from all states had to register with the federal government so that they would be available to join the armed services. This was the first peacetime military draft in American history; the war had not truly started when this law was passed, but it seemed certain that America would be involved when it happened. When war came, the federal government also created and made use of agencies like the Office of Price Administration (OPA) and the War Productions
Board(WPB). Both these agencies greatly expanded federal power. The OPA, created in 1941, was used to control the prices of goods and it required rationing, which limited how these goods were used. Although it basically stopped the free market for a time, by controlling the trade and use of potential military resources the government made sure that everything needed to support the war was available. At home, citizens went without many staples they were accustomed to, such as sugar and fuel.
The War Productions Board decided whether companies would convert from peacetime to wartime productions. This means that if the WPB gave the order, the company that received it would have to stop what they they working on and make something that could be used to help in the war, such as weapons and vehicles. For example, automobile production decreased while military vehicle production increased.
Another instance that showed the governments growing power over people was the relocation of Japanese Americans into internment camps. There was no real reason for this action other than fear because of the Japanese attack on Pearl Harbor. The majority of the people who were relocated were citizens of the United States. Neither these people nor the states they lived in were given any choice in the matter.
2. The Cold War- Similar to in WW II, during the Cold War the expansion of federal power was achieved by establishing agencies such as the House Un-American Activities Committee (HUAC). Unlike the previous war, however, the goal of this agency was not to support a war time effort in production or availability of resources, but was to stem the infiltration of communism in the United States.
The Cold War caused a fear of communism within the United States that seemed to extend into the government. America decided on a policy known as containment, meaning it wanted to stop the worldwide spread of communism. HUAC, which was created in 1938 to investigate domestic Nazi and Ku Klux Klan activities, was made permanent as a powerful organization that searched for the influence of communism in America during the Cold War. Domestic anticommunism became popular, and some people, such as Senator McCarthy used it to their advantage. Many people were unfairly accused as people who wanted power took advantage of the country's fear and paranoia. Civil liberties were restricted and violated as accusers blacklisted the accused without proof and created a threatening environment for any who disagreed with them. Once put on a blacklist, the suspected person was guilty until proven innocent and would find himself without friends or employment. This was not only
the expansion of federal power by the creation of a new agency, but also the expansion of the use of power within that agency to the point of abuse .
This caused such divisiveness in the United States that our own citizens were accused of espionage. Among these citizens were Ethel and Julius Rosenberg, who were convicted of spying for the Soviet Union and executed. There is still controversy over whether or not the Rosenbergs were guilty of betraying their country.
3. Presidents: Kennedy, Johnson and Nixon- Presidents Kennedy, Johnson, and Nixon all had their own thoughts on the amount of power that should be given to the federal government. Generally, it seemed that Johnson and Kennedy agreed. Both wished to increase the government's responsibility, and Johnson passed some of the laws that Kennedy was unable to get to congress. Their ideas were the foundations of the "Great Society" plan of Johnson's term as president. However, Nixon did not agree with this plan. He believed that this plan gave to much responsibility to the federal government, and so he wanted to distribute some powers to state and local governments.
Each of these presidents did at least one major thing that demonstrated the increasing power of the federal government. Specifically, they often used their powers to escalate the conflicts in and surrounding Vietnam. Kennedy, for example, greatly increased the number of troops in Vietnam with a type of draft, forcing selected people to join the military and fight in the war. Johnson increased this draft, further escalating the war, and Nixon used his office to carry out and cover up an invasion of Cambodia, without first having the approval of the rest of the government. This type of behavior by Nixon gave him a reputation of having an "imperial presidency."
Another issue in which all three were involved was the
civil rights movement at the time. Both Johnson and Kennedy passed laws to eliminate most forms of segregation as well as discrimination in voting (the Civil Rights Act of 1964, the Voting Rights Act of 1965). This was a major focus of Johnson's "Great Society," a plan which was meant to improve the domestic situation of the country. Another of its focuses was a "War on Poverty," central to which was the Office of Economic Opportunity, assisting the welfare of the nation's poor.
Nixon tried to undo these actions however, doing what he could to take apart this office and others created by the Great Society program. In some cases, he did not completely get rid of Johnson's creations, but instead dismantled them and gave certain powers they had to other parts of the government. This plan of Nixon's was known as "New Federalism." He also opposed civil rights, in what may have been an attempt to win the support of southern voters. Although Nixon wanted to decrease federal power in some ways, he increased it greatly in other ways. Nixon instituted the Wage and Price Control Act of 1971 that tried to control the economy, particularly the amount of inflation. Unfortunately, this did not go as Nixon had planned and caused the country to go into a recession.
Conclusion- Many of the laws and decisions that the government has made since World War 2 have increased the power of the federal government. Some of these were made because certain people within within the government craved power. Others were made simply because it was the best thing to do for the country. Still, even choices made with good intentions, such as those regarding Civil Rights, no matter how helpful and successful the results, often showed examples of how the beliefs and decisions of the federal government can overpower those of the states and people.
1. Domestic Events during World War II- In the events during and surrounding World War II, the government had to make certain laws and agencies in order to support the war and to keep the domestic sit




2. The Cold War- Similar to in WW II, during the Cold War the expansion of federal power was achieved by establishing agencies such as the House Un-American Activities Committee (HUAC). Unlike the previous war, however, the goal of this agency was not to support a war time effort in production or availability of resources, but was to stem the infiltration of communism in the United States.


This caused such divisiveness in the United States that our own citizens were accused of espionage. Among these citizens were Ethel and Julius Rosenberg, who were convicted of spying for the Soviet Union and executed. There is still controversy over whether or not the Rosenbergs were guilty of betraying their country.
3. Presidents: Kennedy, Johnson and Nixon- Presidents Kennedy, Johnson, and Nixon all had their own thoughts on the amount of power that should be given to the federal government. Generally, it seemed that Johnson and Kennedy agreed. Both wished to increase the government's responsibility, and Johnson passed some of the laws that Kennedy was unable to get to congress. Their ideas were the foundations of the "Great Society" plan of Johnson's term as president. However, Nixon did not agree with this plan. He believed that this plan gave to much responsibility to the federal government, and so he wanted to distribute some powers to state and local governments.

Each of these presidents did at least one major thing that demonstrated the increasing power of the federal government. Specifically, they often used their powers to escalate the conflicts in and surrounding Vietnam. Kennedy, for example, greatly increased the number of troops in Vietnam with a type of draft, forcing selected people to join the military and fight in the war. Johnson increased this draft, further escalating the war, and Nixon used his office to carry out and cover up an invasion of Cambodia, without first having the approval of the rest of the government. This type of behavior by Nixon gave him a reputation of having an "imperial presidency."
Another issue in which all three were involved was the


Conclusion- Many of the laws and decisions that the government has made since World War 2 have increased the power of the federal government. Some of these were made because certain people within within the government craved power. Others were made simply because it was the best thing to do for the country. Still, even choices made with good intentions, such as those regarding Civil Rights, no matter how helpful and successful the results, often showed examples of how the beliefs and decisions of the federal government can overpower those of the states and people.
Tuesday, March 18, 2008
Influence of Isolationism and Fascism on America
Before World War 2, Americans believed in isolationism, meaning that they mostly stayed out of foreign affairs, including wars. During the beginning of the war, America tried to stay neutral. This seemed to be a good choice at the time, since getting involved may not have been necessary, and doing so probably would have escalated the conflict. At that point, there did not seem to be much of a reason to join a side of the war. However, Americans began to fear the type of government that countries such as Germany and Italy were using. Fascist dictatorships were seen as a possible threat to the freedom of America. The fear of totalitarian governments caused America to become less neutral regarding the events in Europe.
Friday, March 7, 2008
Current Events Summary #7
The amount of conflict in Iraq seems to have been escalating recently. Over time, many nation's have gotten involved in this nation's problems, often causing even more violence. The U.S., for example, has been fighting a war in Iraq for years. Now Turkey has begun its own mission in the area.
Turkey has been fighting the Kurdistan Workers' Party (also known as the PKK), a militant group that has been launching attacks on its enemy from the border of Iraq. The Turkish military decided to retaliate by moving its forces into northern Iraq, attacking Kurdish territory. Iraq seems to be insulted by this, claiming that this incursion is violating the government's "sovereignty." Iraq's government has demanded that Turkey pull its troops out.
Both Iraq and the United States have supported Turkey's goal in the past, but neither country approves of this action. The U.S. is as determined as Iraq to convince Turkey to leave. America's Defense Secretary has tried to come to an agreement with Turkish leaders on a time limit for Turkey's mission, but Turkey claims that it cannot make any promises, as it still has to teach "further lessons" and "inflict heavier blows on the PKK." At the moment, it looks like the Turkish raids will continue for a while longer.
Turkey has been fighting the Kurdistan Workers' Party (also known as the PKK), a militant group that has been launching attacks on its enemy from the border of Iraq. The Turkish military decided to retaliate by moving its forces into northern Iraq, attacking Kurdish territory. Iraq seems to be insulted by this, claiming that this incursion is violating the government's "sovereignty." Iraq's government has demanded that Turkey pull its troops out.
Both Iraq and the United States have supported Turkey's goal in the past, but neither country approves of this action. The U.S. is as determined as Iraq to convince Turkey to leave. America's Defense Secretary has tried to come to an agreement with Turkish leaders on a time limit for Turkey's mission, but Turkey claims that it cannot make any promises, as it still has to teach "further lessons" and "inflict heavier blows on the PKK." At the moment, it looks like the Turkish raids will continue for a while longer.
Thursday, March 6, 2008
Project Reflection
This type of independent research project is a very different style of learning from the more traditional style in which the class had previously learned. As such, the new style has some positive qualities, as well as a few problems.
This was the first time I have learned in this style, and I am happy to have had this experience so that I am prepared for similar projects in the future. Knowing how to do this type of work may help for other classes and possibly in college. It has also forced me to learn how to use online tools which I otherwise may never have used. Finally, because of the amount of research that had to be done, I think that the information I have covered will stick with me for a longer time.
There were negative points to this learning style, however. The lack of a more strict time frame and clear rubric for the project has caused trouble for me and other students. The amount of work we have had to do has conflicted with our work in other classes, and as a result many students have struggled to balance their grades. We also do not have as many opportunities to discuss what we have learned as a class.
I think that the traditional style of learning is easiest for the class, although there is a risk that students may not get as much information by learning that way. If this new style is improved and broken down into more manageable pieces, with more clear expectations and due dates, as well as occasional class discussions, it may be a very effective way to learn.
This was the first time I have learned in this style, and I am happy to have had this experience so that I am prepared for similar projects in the future. Knowing how to do this type of work may help for other classes and possibly in college. It has also forced me to learn how to use online tools which I otherwise may never have used. Finally, because of the amount of research that had to be done, I think that the information I have covered will stick with me for a longer time.
There were negative points to this learning style, however. The lack of a more strict time frame and clear rubric for the project has caused trouble for me and other students. The amount of work we have had to do has conflicted with our work in other classes, and as a result many students have struggled to balance their grades. We also do not have as many opportunities to discuss what we have learned as a class.
I think that the traditional style of learning is easiest for the class, although there is a risk that students may not get as much information by learning that way. If this new style is improved and broken down into more manageable pieces, with more clear expectations and due dates, as well as occasional class discussions, it may be a very effective way to learn.
Wednesday, March 5, 2008
Project Finished
The final draft of my project is done. It is posted below, in the place of what used to be my 4th draft.
Monday, March 3, 2008
New History Project!
The second theme that I will research is Theme 1. Demonstrate the evolution of the concepts of personal freedom, individual responsibility, and respect for human dignity. To help me understand this, I will study the following MCAS standards:
• USII.17 Explain important domestic events that took place during WWII.
• USII.21 Analyze how the failure of communist economic policies as well as U.S.-sponsored resistance to Soviet military and diplomatic initiatives contributed to ending the Cold War.
• USII.24 Analyze the roots of domestic anticommunism as well as the origins and consequences of McCarthyism.
• USII.25 Analyze the origins, goals, and key events of the Civil Rights movement.
• USII.26 Describe the accomplishments of the civil rights movement.
I will use Chapters 20, 24, 25, 26, and 29 to explain these standards.
• USII.17 Explain important domestic events that took place during WWII.
• USII.21 Analyze how the failure of communist economic policies as well as U.S.-sponsored resistance to Soviet military and diplomatic initiatives contributed to ending the Cold War.
• USII.24 Analyze the roots of domestic anticommunism as well as the origins and consequences of McCarthyism.
• USII.25 Analyze the origins, goals, and key events of the Civil Rights movement.
• USII.26 Describe the accomplishments of the civil rights movement.
I will use Chapters 20, 24, 25, 26, and 29 to explain these standards.
Friday, February 15, 2008
Centralized State Power
Introduction- Over the course of the United States' history, the power of the federal government has varied with different presidencies, but has gradually increased over the long-term. One particular time in which the growth of federal power can be seen was the period that went from the beginning of World War II to near the end of the Cold War. In this time, the creations of certain laws and agencies that gave more responsibility to the government were often necessary or in the nation's best interests.
1. Domestic Events during World War II- In the events during and surrounding World War II, the government had to make certain laws and agencies in order to support the war and to keep the domestic sit
uation organized. One decision that was made was to recruit soldiers to fight in the war with a draft. In 1940, President Roosevelt signed the Selective Training and Service Act. Men from all states had to register with the federal government so that they would be available to join the armed services. This was the first peacetime military draft in American history; the war had not truly started when this law was passed, but it seemed certain that America would be involved when it happened. When war came, the federal government also created and made use of agencies like the Office of Price Administration (OPA) and the War Productions
Board(WPB). Both these agencies greatly expanded federal power. The OPA, created in 1941, was used to control the prices of goods and it required rationing, which limited how these goods were used. Although it basically stopped the free market for a time, by controlling the trade and use of potential military resources the government made sure that everything needed to support the war was available. At home, citizens went without many staples they were accustomed to, such as sugar and fuel.
The War Productions Board decided whether companies would convert from peacetime to wartime productions. This means that if the WPB gave the order, the company that received it would have to stop what they they working on and make something that could be used to help in the war, such as weapons and vehicles. For example, automobile production decreased while military vehicle production increased.
Another instance that showed the governments growing power over people was the relocation of Japanese Americans into internment camps. There was no real reason for this action other than fear because of the Japanese attack on Pearl Harbor. The majority of the people who were relocated were citizens of the United States. Neither these people nor the states they lived in were given any choice in the matter.
2. The Cold War- Similar to in WW II, during the Cold War the expansion of federal power was achieved by establishing agencies such as the House Un-American Activities Committee (HUAC). Unlike the previous war, however, the goal of this agency was not to support a war time effort in production or availability of resources, but was to stem the infiltration of communism in the United States.
The Cold War caused a fear of communism within the United States that seemed to extend into the government. America decided on a policy known as containment, meaning it wanted to stop the worldwide spread of communism. HUAC, which was created in 1938 to investigate domestic Nazi and Ku Klux Klan activities, was made permanent as a powerful organization that searched for the influence of communism in America during the Cold War. Domestic anticommunism became popular, and some people, such as Senator McCarthy used it to their advantage. Many people were unfairly accused as people who wanted power took advantage of the country's fear and paranoia. Civil liberties were restricted and violated as accusers blacklisted the accused without proof and created a threatening environment for any who disagreed with them. Once put on a blacklist, the suspected person was guilty until proven innocent and would find himself without friends or employment. This was not only
the expansion of federal power by the creation of a new agency, but also the expansion of the use of power within that agency to the point of abuse .
This caused such divisiveness in the United States that our own citizens were accused of espionage. Among these citizens were Ethel and Julius Rosenberg, who were convicted of spying for the Soviet Union and executed. There is still controversy over whether or not the Rosenbergs were guilty of betraying their country.
3. Presidents: Kennedy, Johnson and Nixon- Presidents Kennedy, Johnson, and Nixon all had their own thoughts on the amount of power that should be given to the federal government. Generally, it seemed that Johnson and Kennedy agreed. Both wished to increase the government's responsibility, and Johnson passed some of the laws that Kennedy was unable to get to congress. Their ideas were the foundations of the "Great Society" plan of Johnson's term as president. However, Nixon did not agree with this plan. He believed that this plan gave to much responsibility to the federal government, and so he wanted to distribute some powers to state and local governments.
Each of these presidents did at least one major thing that demonstrated the increasing power of the federal government. Specifically, they often used their powers to escalate the conflicts in and surrounding Vietnam. Kennedy, for example, greatly increased the number of troops in Vietnam with a type of draft, forcing selected people to join the military and fight in the war. Johnson increased this draft, further escalating the war, and Nixon used his office to carry out and cover up an invasion of Cambodia, without first having the approval of the rest of the government. This type of behavior by Nixon gave him a reputation of having an "imperial presidency."
Another issue in which all three were involved was the
civil rights movement at the time. Both Johnson and Kennedy passed laws to eliminate most forms of segregation as well as discrimination in voting (the Civil Rights Act of 1964, the Voting Rights Act of 1965). This was a major focus of Johnson's "Great Society," a plan which was meant to improve the domestic situation of the country. Another of its focuses was a "War on Poverty," central to which was the Office of Economic Opportunity, assisting the welfare of the nation's poor.
Nixon tried to undo these actions however, doing what he could to take apart this office and others created by the Great Society program. In some cases, he did not completely get rid of Johnson's creations, but instead dismantled them and gave certain powers they had to other parts of the government. This plan of Nixon's was known as "New Federalism." He also opposed civil rights, in what may have been an attempt to win the support of southern voters. Although Nixon wanted to decrease federal power in some ways, he increased it greatly in other ways. Nixon instituted the Wage and Price Control Act of 1971 that tried to control the economy, particularly the amount of inflation. Unfortunately, this did not go as Nixon had planned and caused the country to go into a recession.
Conclusion- Many of the laws and decisions that the government has made since World War 2 have increased the power of the federal government. Some of these were made because certain people within within the government craved power. Others were made simply because it was the best thing to do for the country. Still, even choices made with good intentions, such as those regarding Civil Rights, no matter how helpful and successful the results, often showed examples of how the beliefs and decisions of the federal government can overpower those of the states and people.
1. Domestic Events during World War II- In the events during and surrounding World War II, the government had to make certain laws and agencies in order to support the war and to keep the domestic sit




2. The Cold War- Similar to in WW II, during the Cold War the expansion of federal power was achieved by establishing agencies such as the House Un-American Activities Committee (HUAC). Unlike the previous war, however, the goal of this agency was not to support a war time effort in production or availability of resources, but was to stem the infiltration of communism in the United States.


This caused such divisiveness in the United States that our own citizens were accused of espionage. Among these citizens were Ethel and Julius Rosenberg, who were convicted of spying for the Soviet Union and executed. There is still controversy over whether or not the Rosenbergs were guilty of betraying their country.
3. Presidents: Kennedy, Johnson and Nixon- Presidents Kennedy, Johnson, and Nixon all had their own thoughts on the amount of power that should be given to the federal government. Generally, it seemed that Johnson and Kennedy agreed. Both wished to increase the government's responsibility, and Johnson passed some of the laws that Kennedy was unable to get to congress. Their ideas were the foundations of the "Great Society" plan of Johnson's term as president. However, Nixon did not agree with this plan. He believed that this plan gave to much responsibility to the federal government, and so he wanted to distribute some powers to state and local governments.

Each of these presidents did at least one major thing that demonstrated the increasing power of the federal government. Specifically, they often used their powers to escalate the conflicts in and surrounding Vietnam. Kennedy, for example, greatly increased the number of troops in Vietnam with a type of draft, forcing selected people to join the military and fight in the war. Johnson increased this draft, further escalating the war, and Nixon used his office to carry out and cover up an invasion of Cambodia, without first having the approval of the rest of the government. This type of behavior by Nixon gave him a reputation of having an "imperial presidency."
Another issue in which all three were involved was the


Conclusion- Many of the laws and decisions that the government has made since World War 2 have increased the power of the federal government. Some of these were made because certain people within within the government craved power. Others were made simply because it was the best thing to do for the country. Still, even choices made with good intentions, such as those regarding Civil Rights, no matter how helpful and successful the results, often showed examples of how the beliefs and decisions of the federal government can overpower those of the states and people.
Wednesday, February 6, 2008
Current Events Summary #6
Recently, Iran has had some trouble with certain countries in the United Nations. The UN has been concerned about Iran's use of nuclear power. Some countries, including the United States, believe that Iran could be using their technology to create nuclear weapons. This fear may come from the fact that Iran had been testing ballistic missiles.
Iran dismisses these accusations as false, claiming that the rocket was meant to help the country's space research program, and promising that it would use nuclear power only as a source of energy.
Still, Britain, France, China, Russia and the United States and Germany have agreed to pass new sanctions against Iran. It seems that Iran will have limited access to nuclear power until the International Atomic Energy Agency comes up with a resolution.
Some countries, such as South Africa and Iran itself want the UN to wait for what the IAEA has to say on the issue before the UN makes any decisions. However, the U.S. says that it has "waited long enough." At the moment, it sounds as if the sanctions against Iran will be passed.
Iran dismisses these accusations as false, claiming that the rocket was meant to help the country's space research program, and promising that it would use nuclear power only as a source of energy.
Still, Britain, France, China, Russia and the United States and Germany have agreed to pass new sanctions against Iran. It seems that Iran will have limited access to nuclear power until the International Atomic Energy Agency comes up with a resolution.
Some countries, such as South Africa and Iran itself want the UN to wait for what the IAEA has to say on the issue before the UN makes any decisions. However, the U.S. says that it has "waited long enough." At the moment, it sounds as if the sanctions against Iran will be passed.
Centralized State Power Outline 3 (changing to final draft)
Introduction- Over the course of the United States' history, the power of the federal government has varied with different presidencies, but has gradually increased over the long-term. One particular time in which the growth of federal power can be seen was the period that went from the beginning of World War II to near the end of the Cold War. In this time, the creations of certain laws and agencies that gave more responsibility to the government often seemed to be necessary or in the nation's best interests.
1. Domestic Events during World War II- In the events during and surrounding World War II, the government had to make certain laws and agencies in order to support the war and to keep the domestic situation organized. One decision that was made was to recruit soldiers to fight in the war with a draft. In 1940, President Roosevelt signed the Selective Training and Service Act. Men from all states had to register with the federal government so that they would be available to join the armed services. This was the first peacetime military draft in American history; the war had not truly started when this law was passed, but it seemed certain that America would be involved when it happened. When war came, the federal government also created and made use of agencies like the Office of Price Administration (OPA) and the War Productions Board(WPB). Both these agencies greatly expanded federal power. The OPA, created in 1941, was used to control the prices of goods and it required rationing, which limited how these goods were used. Although it basically stopped the free market for a time, by controlling the trade and use of potential military resources the government made sure that everything needed to support the war was available. At home, citizens went without many staples they were accustomed to, such as sugar and fuel. The War Productions Board decided whether companies would convert from peacetime to wartime productions. This means that if the WPB gave the order, the company that received it would have to stop what they they working on and make something that could be used to help in the war, such as weapons and vehicles. For example, automobile production decreased while military vehicle production increased. Another instance that showed the governments growing power over people was the relocation of Japanese Americans into internment camps. There was no real reason for this action other than fear because of the Japanese attack on Pearl Harbor. The majority of the people who were relocated were citizens of the United States. Neither these people nor the states they lived in were given any choice in the matter.
2. The Cold War- Similar to in WW II, during the Cold War the expansion of federal power was achieved by establishing agencies such as the House Un-American Activities Committee (HUAC). Unlike the previous war, however, the goal of this agency was not to support a war time effort in production or availability of resources, but was to stem the infiltration of communism in the United States.
The Cold War caused a fear of communism within the United States that seemed to extend into the government. America decided on a policy known as containment, meaning it wanted to stop the worldwide spread of communism. HUAC, which was created in 1938 to investigate domestic Nazi and Ku Klux Klan activities, was made permanent as a powerful organization that searched for the influence of communism in America during the Cold War. Domestic anticommunism became popular, and some people, such as Senator McCarthy used it to their advantage. Many people were unfairly accused as people who wanted power took advantage of the country's fear and paranoia. Civil liberties were restricted and violated as accusers blacklisted the accused without proof and created a threatening environment for any who disagreed with them. Once put on a blacklist, the suspected person was guilty until proven innocent and would find himself without friends or employment. This was not only the expansion of federal power by the creation of a new agency, but also the expansion of the use of power within that agency to the point of abuse .
This caused such divisiveness in the United States that our own citizens were accused of espionage. Among these citizens were Ethel and Julius Rosenberg, who were convicted of spying for the Soviet Union and executed. There is still controversy over whether or not the Rosenbergs were guilty of betraying their country.
3. Presidents: Kennedy, Johnson and Nixon- Presidents Kennedy, Johnson, and Nixon all had their own thoughts on the amount of power that should be given to the federal government. Generally, it seemed that Johnson and Kennedy agreed. Both wished to increase the government's responsibility, and Johnson passed some of the laws that Kennedy was unable to get to congress. Their ideas were the foundations of the "Great Society" plan of Johnson's term as president. However, Nixon did not agree with them. He believed that this plan gave to much responsibility to the federal government, and so he wanted to distribute some powers to state and local governments.
Conclusion-
NOTES: add conclusion and more about Great Society and Nixon, examples
1. Domestic Events during World War II- In the events during and surrounding World War II, the government had to make certain laws and agencies in order to support the war and to keep the domestic situation organized. One decision that was made was to recruit soldiers to fight in the war with a draft. In 1940, President Roosevelt signed the Selective Training and Service Act. Men from all states had to register with the federal government so that they would be available to join the armed services. This was the first peacetime military draft in American history; the war had not truly started when this law was passed, but it seemed certain that America would be involved when it happened. When war came, the federal government also created and made use of agencies like the Office of Price Administration (OPA) and the War Productions Board(WPB). Both these agencies greatly expanded federal power. The OPA, created in 1941, was used to control the prices of goods and it required rationing, which limited how these goods were used. Although it basically stopped the free market for a time, by controlling the trade and use of potential military resources the government made sure that everything needed to support the war was available. At home, citizens went without many staples they were accustomed to, such as sugar and fuel. The War Productions Board decided whether companies would convert from peacetime to wartime productions. This means that if the WPB gave the order, the company that received it would have to stop what they they working on and make something that could be used to help in the war, such as weapons and vehicles. For example, automobile production decreased while military vehicle production increased. Another instance that showed the governments growing power over people was the relocation of Japanese Americans into internment camps. There was no real reason for this action other than fear because of the Japanese attack on Pearl Harbor. The majority of the people who were relocated were citizens of the United States. Neither these people nor the states they lived in were given any choice in the matter.
2. The Cold War- Similar to in WW II, during the Cold War the expansion of federal power was achieved by establishing agencies such as the House Un-American Activities Committee (HUAC). Unlike the previous war, however, the goal of this agency was not to support a war time effort in production or availability of resources, but was to stem the infiltration of communism in the United States.
The Cold War caused a fear of communism within the United States that seemed to extend into the government. America decided on a policy known as containment, meaning it wanted to stop the worldwide spread of communism. HUAC, which was created in 1938 to investigate domestic Nazi and Ku Klux Klan activities, was made permanent as a powerful organization that searched for the influence of communism in America during the Cold War. Domestic anticommunism became popular, and some people, such as Senator McCarthy used it to their advantage. Many people were unfairly accused as people who wanted power took advantage of the country's fear and paranoia. Civil liberties were restricted and violated as accusers blacklisted the accused without proof and created a threatening environment for any who disagreed with them. Once put on a blacklist, the suspected person was guilty until proven innocent and would find himself without friends or employment. This was not only the expansion of federal power by the creation of a new agency, but also the expansion of the use of power within that agency to the point of abuse .
This caused such divisiveness in the United States that our own citizens were accused of espionage. Among these citizens were Ethel and Julius Rosenberg, who were convicted of spying for the Soviet Union and executed. There is still controversy over whether or not the Rosenbergs were guilty of betraying their country.
3. Presidents: Kennedy, Johnson and Nixon- Presidents Kennedy, Johnson, and Nixon all had their own thoughts on the amount of power that should be given to the federal government. Generally, it seemed that Johnson and Kennedy agreed. Both wished to increase the government's responsibility, and Johnson passed some of the laws that Kennedy was unable to get to congress. Their ideas were the foundations of the "Great Society" plan of Johnson's term as president. However, Nixon did not agree with them. He believed that this plan gave to much responsibility to the federal government, and so he wanted to distribute some powers to state and local governments.
Conclusion-
NOTES: add conclusion and more about Great Society and Nixon, examples
Friday, February 1, 2008
Centralized State Power Outline 2
1. Domestic Events during World War 2
During World War Two, the government had to make certain laws and agencies in order to support the war and to keep the domestic situation organized. One decision that was made was to recruit soldiers to fight in the war with a draft. Agencies like the Office of Price Association and the War Productions Board were also created. The OPA was used with laws such as the Revenue Act of 1942 to help regulate the economy, and War Productions Board decided whether companies would convert to wartime productions. The government also encouraged people to support the war through rationing.
2. The Cold War
The Cold War caused a fear of communism within the United States. This fear seemed to extend into the government. America decided on a policy known as containment, meaning it wanted to stop the spread of communism. Also, the government created the House Un-American Activities Committee, an organization that searched for the influence of communism in America. Domestic anticommunism became popular, and some people, such as Senator McCarthy used it to their advantage. Many people were unfairly accused because these people wanted power.
3. Presidents-Kennedy, Johnson and Nixon
Presidents Kennedy, Johnson, and Nixon all had thoughts on the amount of power that should be given to the federal government. Generally, It seemed that Johnson and Kennedy agreed. Both wished to increase the government's responsibility, and Johnson passed some of the laws that Kennedy was unable to get to congress. Their ideas were the foundations of the "Great Society" plan of Johnson's term as president. However, Nixon did not agree with them. He believed that this plan gave to much responsibility to the federal government, and so he wanted to distribute some powers to state and local governments.
This is only a rough draft. I will add more details and paragraphs into the final product.
During World War Two, the government had to make certain laws and agencies in order to support the war and to keep the domestic situation organized. One decision that was made was to recruit soldiers to fight in the war with a draft. Agencies like the Office of Price Association and the War Productions Board were also created. The OPA was used with laws such as the Revenue Act of 1942 to help regulate the economy, and War Productions Board decided whether companies would convert to wartime productions. The government also encouraged people to support the war through rationing.
2. The Cold War
The Cold War caused a fear of communism within the United States. This fear seemed to extend into the government. America decided on a policy known as containment, meaning it wanted to stop the spread of communism. Also, the government created the House Un-American Activities Committee, an organization that searched for the influence of communism in America. Domestic anticommunism became popular, and some people, such as Senator McCarthy used it to their advantage. Many people were unfairly accused because these people wanted power.
3. Presidents-Kennedy, Johnson and Nixon
Presidents Kennedy, Johnson, and Nixon all had thoughts on the amount of power that should be given to the federal government. Generally, It seemed that Johnson and Kennedy agreed. Both wished to increase the government's responsibility, and Johnson passed some of the laws that Kennedy was unable to get to congress. Their ideas were the foundations of the "Great Society" plan of Johnson's term as president. However, Nixon did not agree with them. He believed that this plan gave to much responsibility to the federal government, and so he wanted to distribute some powers to state and local governments.
This is only a rough draft. I will add more details and paragraphs into the final product.
Monday, January 28, 2008
Centralized State Power Outline
- Domestic Events during World War 2
- Draft was expanded to recruit more soldiers
- The government passed laws such as the Revenue Act of 1942 and created agencies like the Office of Price Administration (OPA) in order to regulate economy
- War Productions Board decided whether companies would convert to wartime production
- Rationing (people were to try to save food, gas, and shoes, among other things, to help support the war effort)
- The Cold War
- McCarthyism (domestic anticommunism) - House Un-American Activities Committee searched for the influence of communism in the U.S. Many people are unfairly accused of being or working for communists.
- Containment- U.S. wanted to stop the expansion of communism. The Marshall Plan gave billions of dollars of help to European countries, making communism less appealing
- Presidents- Kennedy, Johnson, and Nixon
- Both Kennedy and Johnson wanted to use government power to right economic and social wrongs. Johnson passed laws that Kennedy was unable to get to congress. Their ideas ended up forming the basis of the Great Society.
- Many people supported the growth of centralized state power, thinking that the government could use its power to solve the nation's problems.
- State-required loyalty oaths made judged unconstitutional
- Nixon wanted to decrease government power, thought that the Great Society gave the government too much responsibility.
Friday, January 11, 2008
Essential Questions
- From whose viewpoint are we seeing or reading or hearing? From what angle or perspective?
- These current event summaries are based on news articles that come from various sources. Most of these are secondary sources, articles written by those who have witnessed or examined in detail events having to do with the interactions of separate nations. Some primary sources, such as the leaders of the countries involved in these events, may give biased opinions.
- How do we know when we know? What's the evidence, and how reliable is it?
- Some articles are purely factual, giving specific details and evidence, often in the form of quotes. However, some articles are just interpretations of current events. These will usually give little evidence and are usually just opinions and observations, and so they may be less reliable.
- How are things, events, or people connected to each other? What is the cause and what is the effect? How do they fit together?
- While foreign policy is the focus of these current event summaries, many nations' actions in foreign policy are based around the events within the nations themselves. These nations are sometimes in situations that require them to deal with other countries to help their own interests.
- What's new and what's old? Have we run across this idea before?
- Countries have always interacted with each other, often trying to come to an agreement so that they may reach a mutual goal. One focus of these goals is to improve situations such as the conflicts within and between South Asian countries. These conflicts are not, for the most part, new, having very old roots.
- So what? Why does it matter? What does it all mean?
- The interactions between nations in South Asia are very important to know about. Some major conflicts or significant deals and agreements could potentially affect the rest of the world. In some cases, they have already begun to do so.

Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)